Ukorebi Esien | May 30, 2026
CALABAR – The Cross River State Consultative Forum (CRSCF) has challenged the credibility of a recent quality-of-life report published by SBM Intelligence, describing its findings on Cross River State as methodologically weak, analytically imbalanced, and incapable of supporting the sweeping conclusions reached by the researchers.
In a statement signed by its Chairman, Barr. Eyo Nsa Ekpo, and Secretary, Dr. Julius Ochim Okputu, the Forum expressed concern over the report titled "Where Nigerian Families Actually Thrive," which ranked Cross River poorly across several governance and livability indicators.
While acknowledging the role of independent policy research in promoting democratic accountability and informed public discourse, the Forum argued that the report's conclusions were undermined by what it described as significant limitations in sampling, data interpretation, and analytical balance.
According to the CRSCF, the report relied on a Quality of Life Survey involving only 442 respondents and a Power Survey comprising 191 respondents across multiple states and the Federal Capital Territory. The Forum contended that such sample sizes were insufficient to draw definitive conclusions about the living conditions of millions of residents spread across diverse social, economic, and geographic contexts.
"The report makes far-reaching assertions about state performance, including references to systemic governance failure and state collapse, based on data that cannot reasonably be considered representative of entire state populations," the statement noted.
The Forum further criticized the report for what it described as the blending of empirical analysis with editorial commentary, alleging that portions of the publication relied heavily on anecdotal accounts, subjective interpretations, media narratives, and emotionally charged language rather than comprehensive longitudinal governance data.
While acknowledging that developmental challenges remain in Cross River State, the CRSCF argued that the report failed to adequately situate such challenges within the broader national economic realities confronting virtually all states in Nigeria. These include inflationary pressures, the effects of fuel subsidy removal, exchange rate volatility, rising energy costs, and widespread infrastructure deficits.
The Forum maintained that quality-of-life outcomes cannot be evaluated in isolation from the prevailing macroeconomic environment, particularly within a federal system where many fiscal and structural factors remain outside the direct control of state governments.
Highlighting what it termed internal inconsistencies in the report, the CRSCF pointed out that despite portraying Cross River as suffering severe institutional decline, the publication also indicated that 59.1 percent of respondents in the state remained optimistic about future improvements in electricity supply—a figure reportedly higher than those recorded for Abuja and Anambra State.
The Forum also referenced findings relating to Rivers State, which reportedly performed strongly in healthcare, infrastructure, and stability metrics but still recorded a relocation intention rate of 40.4 percent. According to the CRSCF, this suggests that migration intentions are influenced by a broader range of economic, social, and psychological factors than governance indicators alone.
Defending the administration of Governor Bassey Otu, the Forum argued that the report overlooked several ongoing reforms and development initiatives implemented since 2023 under the state's "People First" agenda.
Among the interventions cited were ongoing road construction and rehabilitation projects across the state, including work on the Calabar–Akamkpa corridor, the Okuku–Yala axis, and several rural road networks in Yakurr, Biase, Ikom, and Odukpani Local Government Areas. The Forum also highlighted urban renewal projects and drainage rehabilitation efforts within Calabar.
In the health sector, the CRSCF pointed to the revitalisation of primary healthcare centres across the state's 18 local government areas, upgrades to dialysis facilities in Calabar and Ogoja, expansion of health insurance coverage, and targeted healthcare programmes for vulnerable populations.
The statement further highlighted government interventions in education, including the payment of WAEC fees for thousands of students over the past three years, rehabilitation of school infrastructure, provision of classroom furniture, promotion of education personnel, and investments in technical and vocational education.
The Forum also cited efforts to revitalise key tourism assets such as Marina Resort and Obudu Ranch Resort, as well as the repositioning of Carnival Calabar, which it claimed has witnessed a significant increase in attendance.
On economic empowerment and agriculture, the CRSCF referenced partnerships under programmes such as LIFE-ND, APPEALS, and FADAMA, alongside youth-focused initiatives and rural development projects aimed at improving livelihoods and boosting productivity.
The Forum additionally noted the payment of pension and gratuity backlogs, recruitment of more than 10,000 individuals into the state's public service, and other welfare-oriented interventions as evidence of ongoing governance reforms.
While reiterating that Cross River State still faces developmental challenges requiring sustained policy attention and institutional strengthening, the Forum rejected what it described as "sweeping narratives of collapse," insisting that such characterisations neither reflect the resilience of the state's people nor contribute constructively to policy dialogue.
The CRSCF warned that sensational conclusions could negatively affect investor confidence, tourism prospects, and public morale, adding that available data from national institutions indicate that many of the challenges identified in the report are not unique to Cross River State.
The Forum therefore called on research institutions, policy organisations, and development stakeholders to adopt more transparent methodologies, broader sampling frameworks, stronger peer-review mechanisms, and balanced analytical language when producing reports with significant political and socioeconomic implications.
It reaffirmed its commitment to evidence-based advocacy, constructive engagement, and collaborative efforts aimed at promoting sustainable development, strengthening governance institutions, and improving the quality of life of citizens in Cross River State and across Nigeria.


