An On Air Personality with the Cross River Broad casting Corporation CRBC Nteng Ochuwe Ekpang has taken a futile step in defence of the grammatical/typographical errors made by the Secratary to Cross River State Government Barr. Tina Agbor.
Recall that last week, the social media was flooded with discussions of the grammatical blunder made by the SSG of Cross River State as published by Negroid Haven.
You Can also read:
'ON PATRIOTIC' or 'UNPATRIOTIC': SSG, Barr. Tina Agbor goofs while addressing organised labourhttp://www.negroidhaven.org/2017/06/on-patriotic-or-unpatriotic-ssg-barr.htmlhttp://www.negroidhaven.org/2017/06/on-patriotic-or-unpatriotic-ssg-barr.html

to get full gist read:
C’River SSG grammatical blunders sparks English mastery exercise, CRUTECH lecturer implicated' http://thedailynewsng.blogspot.com.ng/2017/06/criver-ssg-grammatical-blunders-sparks.html
shortly after that Mr. Nteng Ekpang took to his facebook wall where he struggled in futile effort to redeem the name of the SSG.
below is Ekpang's article in full:
IN DEFENCE OF BARR.
TINA AGBOR, SECRETARY TO CROSS RIVER STATE GOVERNMENT, AND HER ERROR-LADEN PRESS
RELEASE OF 21ST JUNE 2017.
I was relaxing in my sitting room, going through some of the messages on the CRBC “staff” (as the admin would have it called, because not everybody is a staff) Whatsapp group, where some of my colleagues who are casual staff were lamenting that the strike was of no importance to us because whatever it will achieve, will be of no consequence to us.
Then I saw Sunny Inah , CRBC government house correspondent
typing. I knew it was not going to be unconnected with government and probably
the ongoing industrial action. Surely it was. Indeed it was the much talked
about error-laden press release of Barr. Tina Agbor that Sunny dropped.
I was the first to
pick on it. So before you read the caption alone and conclude that I have
ascribed infallibility to myself, or start your attack, which you are entitled
to anyway) on the grounds that I am a praise singer of this government, which I
have a right to be if I chose to, note that I was first to condemn it. In fact
these were my words on the platform:
‘’Very shallow, grammatically incoherent and disgraceful of an SSG, lacking in content, unappealing, non-persuasive, providing no grounds for calling off the strike and absolutely nonsensical”.
A few others later
followed suit with one comment or the other. In all we said, Princess Janice Cobham captured our collective
mood when she said:
‘’NTEN you are so correct. I don’t believe this came from the SSG. Grammar so poor. How on earth can one say on patriotic? The gods must hear this’’.
That was the general
mood that day, and our position till date, until proven otherwise because we
expect more from the person and office of the SSG, and for the records, it is
not wrong to have such expectations. As a matter of fact, I could only say what
I said earlier because of the conviction that it certainly was not directly
from Madam.
Sooner than later,
one of the media aides of the government shared the release on Facebook, and as
expected, it wasn’t long before it became an item of mockery on the social
media space.
While this was going
on, few questions found their way to my mind with likely answers as it were…
-How did this press release make its way to the press without the much needed
scrutiny?
-Who was the typist at governor’s office that could not cross the hurdle of simple spellings or grammar rules?
-Who is Barr. Tina’s Media or Press Officer if any?
-Couldn’t any of Governor Ayade’s retinue of media officers look at it before it was published?
-Did the SSG actually set her eyes on that release before it left her office?
-If yes, was it wrong for her to have subjected it to another person for simple proof-reading?
-Who was the typist at governor’s office that could not cross the hurdle of simple spellings or grammar rules?
-Who is Barr. Tina’s Media or Press Officer if any?
-Couldn’t any of Governor Ayade’s retinue of media officers look at it before it was published?
-Did the SSG actually set her eyes on that release before it left her office?
-If yes, was it wrong for her to have subjected it to another person for simple proof-reading?
Before I attempt
answering some of these questions, let me put it on record that i am neither
promoting incompetence, mediocrity nor making excuses for Secretary Tina Agbor.
But if we make room for human error and other circumstances beyond our control,
then we might just see the need to pardon the SSG who under normal circumstance
won’t churn out that kind of release.
First of all, chances
are that the SSG may not have even set her eyes on that release before it was
eventually made public because the release as it was published online and as I
later saw it in the newsroom, was not signed. Meaning that if she had seen it
before it made its way to the newsroom, she could have signed it.
Her supposed absent
was not unconnected with an earlier press release from the commissioner for
information and orientation Mrs. Rosemary Archibong conveying Governor Ayade’s
directive for all appointees to proceed to their LGAs and mobilize their
constituents who are eighteen years and above and have not registered with INEC
to do so ahead of future election.
So Mrs. Agbor could
have traveled at that time. But her appearance the next day with Barr.
Ekpenyong Henshaw, the Head of Service at a press briefing on the industrial
action and their subsequent appeal to labour to call it off meant she was
around but may have been very busy and as such delegated that responsibility to
someone else.
The pressure she is under at this time is understandable when
viewed against the backdrop that Governor also pushing her to find a quick
solution in the interim before the demands of labour are met.
Again, since the
governor’s aides were all at their LGA’s for the continuous voter registration,
whoever the typist was, or whoever carried the press release to CRBC was helpless
in the interim and needed it to get to the station as soon as possible, without
much or any proof-reading, because we all know that our SSG can spell the word
“unpatriotic” and not ‘”on patriotic”, which was arguably the most visible
error.
That said, I felt even more moved to do this piece after looking at some of
those who were in a hurry to pick on Secretary Tina’s errors in the release
that they themselves became victims of the same crime, if you like.
I remember the piece
by Efio-Ita Effiom Nyok on the release; it sparked
an online grammar course when some of the people who commented on the post
found errors in it. He later admitted his errors and the gist moved on.
It was not about him
alone; others too found themselves in the same position as their correction too
were laden with one or two errors till my revered teacher of many years,
Cornelius Ellah had to come to the rescue.
As a matter of fact, Ukorebi Esien later did a piece to capture the
entire episode with the caption “ C’River SSG grammatical blunders sparks
English mastery exercise, CRUTECH lecturer implicated”.
In fact from that
caption alone, one can see that the plural noun ‘blunders’ was supposed to
follow a plural verb ‘spark’ but the author mistakenly used the singular noun
‘sparks’.
All of these is to
tell you that no one is above mistakes as far as the English language is
concerned. Even this write-up may have a couple of errors because I didn’t give
it out for proof-reading. The fact that some textbooks, journals, magazines,
newspapers etc, pass this test is because of the many hands they pass through.
So, given that none
is above mistakes, as aptly exemplified by those of us who were not pleased
with madam SSG, and in the process of expressing our displeasure stabbed
ourselves, it is pertinent that when we see such blunders in future, we take a
moment to remember that we also could be victims of such at one time or the
other; else it will be a case of removing the log in our eyes before asking the
other person, no matter how highly placed, to get rid of the speck in their
eyes.
Before i conclude, my
friend Nyok had his errors pardoned because he admitted them; will Madam SSG
admit hers? Chances are slim because she may not see what transpired online.
So lets just leave
her alone and hope for better days ahead.
0 comments: